Engineering service / System integration

Resolve connectivity and integration failures blocking your launch.

Devices drop offline and never reconnect. Telemetry disappears between the sensor and the dashboard. Hardware and firmware pass separate tests but fail together. Hughie Systems traces these failures across the product, implements corrections, and verifies recovery under real operating conditions.

Interfaces · connectivity · telemetry · diagnostics · fault recovery · production validation
When to bring us in

When the demo works, but the full system cannot pass release testing.

Integration problems live between ownership boundaries. Firmware may follow one model of device state while the backend follows another. Hardware timing may violate an assumption in a driver. A nominal test may pass while recovery behavior fails under power loss, packet delay, or partial configuration.

Subsystem boundaries

“Every subsystem passes, but integration is blocking the launch.”

Drivers, firmware, and backend services pass their own tests, but startup sequencing, interface timing, or conflicting device state breaks the complete product. We trace the failing interaction across team boundaries.

Dropped connections

“The device drops offline and never reconnects.”

Cellular or Wi-Fi recovers, but the MQTT session stays disconnected until someone reboots the device. We investigate modem, network, TLS, and application state, then exercise reconnect and resubscribe behavior.

Production

“Manufacturing adds a new set of failures.”

Programming, identity, calibration, configuration, validation, traceability, and test results are not yet a dependable repeatable flow.

Diagnosis

“Customers report missing data, but our logs show nothing.”

Telemetry may be lost, duplicated, delayed, or dropped when queues fill. We trace data from acquisition through buffering and transport to backend receipt, adding timestamps and counters where visibility is missing.

Scope

Engineering across the boundaries that determine whether the product works.

Hughie Systems can own the investigation, define the system-level contract, implement the highest-value fixes, and build enough observability and validation to prove behavior beyond the original failure case.

01 / INTEGRATION

System state and interface contracts

Make timing, data ownership, initialization, command handling, error behavior, and recovery explicit across firmware, hardware, communications, and backend boundaries.

02 / CONNECTIVITY

Communications and fault recovery

Investigate connection drops, failed MQTT reconnects, retry loops, and stalled transfers. Implement explicit connection state, resubscription, bounded retries, buffering, and recovery for intermittent cellular, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and mesh links.

03 / OBSERVABILITY

Telemetry and remote diagnostics

Capture the minimum useful health, state, logs, counters, version data, and fault history required to diagnose the product remotely and shorten time to root cause.

04 / HARDENING

Production and field validation

Exercise startup, long-running behavior, degraded communications, power interruption, corrupted or missing state, production configuration, and recovery paths before deployment scale makes failures expensive.

Working method

Follow the failure through the whole system.

The goal is not to produce a boundary diagram and stop. The investigation follows real signals, state transitions, timing, data, and control across the product until the failure is explained and a durable correction can be verified.

Hardware interfacesRTOSEmbedded LinuxCellularWi-FiEthernetMQTTTelemetryManufacturing test
01
Reproduce or bound the failureInstrument the system, establish evidence, and separate the observed symptom from the state transition or interface that creates it.
02
Correct the system contractChange the responsible interface, state model, sequencing, storage, communications, or recovery behavior rather than masking the symptom.
03
Prove adjacent failure casesVerify normal behavior and the degraded cases most likely to reproduce the same class of failure in production or the field.
A useful outcome

A system that can be built, observed, and supported.

Resolved integration riskThe failure is connected to a specific system contract and corrected at the responsible boundary.
Production-ready behaviorConfiguration, validation, degraded states, and recovery paths are explicit and repeatable.
Field visibilityEngineering and support can see enough device state to diagnose failures without relying on physical reproduction.

Are dropped connections or integration failures holding up release?

Tell us which components work separately, what fails when they run together, and what restores operation. Include the network type, available logs, and the milestone at risk.